<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Generation IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between business and information technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better Code:  Code Reviews by Fried Poul</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2011/10/03/better-code-code-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Poul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=250#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>Useful information about better code!! I think those who are related with such topic work, this post will be pretty handy for them. Good job and thanks for sharing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful information about better code!! I think those who are related with such topic work, this post will be pretty handy for them. Good job and thanks for sharing. <img src='http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scott Pilgrim vs. the World: Quick Review by infocyde</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/08/15/scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>infocyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=200#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>April 10th...long time no post.  Followed the link from a post about Telerik Radcombo&#039;s on Stackoverflow.  Over 2k views, only one comment, yours.

Glad the move appears to be working out for you and you have better things to do then blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April 10th&#8230;long time no post.  Followed the link from a post about Telerik Radcombo&#8217;s on Stackoverflow.  Over 2k views, only one comment, yours.</p>
<p>Glad the move appears to be working out for you and you have better things to do then blog <img src='http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visible=&#8221;false&#8221; vs. display:none; by Musab</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2008/10/13/visiblefalse-vs-displaynone/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Musab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 10:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=6#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>Thank for clearing that up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for clearing that up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my iTablet! by New happenings &#171; Generation IT</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/01/28/wheres-my-itablet/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>New happenings &#171; Generation IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=154#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>[...] am getting an iPad.  Remember my previous post, Where&#039;s my iTablet? Yeah, I played with the gadget in the Apple store and was very impressed with it.  Also, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am getting an iPad.  Remember my previous post, Where&#39;s my iTablet? Yeah, I played with the gadget in the Apple store and was very impressed with it.  Also, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Name is Matthew Doyle, and I am Moving by Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/03/16/my-name-is-matthew-doyle-and-i-am-moving/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=169#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>So are you moving back to where you used to live. IIRC Smithtown or somewhere near it? Since I&#039;ve been to Mike&#039;s, Bean&#039;s, and soon John&#039;s home turf I probably should come out to yours at some point in the future if that&#039;s okay with you.

Also, congratulations on the engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you moving back to where you used to live. IIRC Smithtown or somewhere near it? Since I&#8217;ve been to Mike&#8217;s, Bean&#8217;s, and soon John&#8217;s home turf I probably should come out to yours at some point in the future if that&#8217;s okay with you.</p>
<p>Also, congratulations on the engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my iTablet! by Matthew Doyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/01/28/wheres-my-itablet/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=154#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>If Apple designed a tablet with a writing device, I wouldn&#039;t have posted this.  I had a need,  I felt that with all the rumors going around my need was fulfilled, and it wasn&#039;t.  I and many others feel that way.  

I didn&#039;t attack anything specific about the iPad, but because you felt the need to address them, I will counter-point them:

Multitasking: It should be a choice.  I should be allowed to and recognize that the battery life will drain.  By Apple not letting me do that, it impedes on how I want to use the device.  It&#039;s a negative.  If you can live with it (I do with my iPhone and have no problems) fine.

Flash:  It&#039;s not going to die any time soon.  Devices coming out currently should not be abandoning it.

Thick Bezel:  I cant really comment without seeing it.  You may be right, but it looks awkward.

Keyboard:  I think the keyboard they designed with it is best they could do with a touch screen.  I&#039;d prefer a physical keyboard, but that would require more hardware.

Camera:  I agree that this device doesn&#039;t need a camera.  The 14-year old argument however, I don&#039;t agree with.  As the world gets smaller, offices start to spread and telecommunication becomes more standard, web cams and streaming videos are going to be a large part of corporate life.

Oh, and you can also use your iPhone while you poop.  The iPad doesn&#039;t cover any of my needs, therefore I will not be purchasing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple designed a tablet with a writing device, I wouldn&#8217;t have posted this.  I had a need,  I felt that with all the rumors going around my need was fulfilled, and it wasn&#8217;t.  I and many others feel that way.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t attack anything specific about the iPad, but because you felt the need to address them, I will counter-point them:</p>
<p>Multitasking: It should be a choice.  I should be allowed to and recognize that the battery life will drain.  By Apple not letting me do that, it impedes on how I want to use the device.  It&#8217;s a negative.  If you can live with it (I do with my iPhone and have no problems) fine.</p>
<p>Flash:  It&#8217;s not going to die any time soon.  Devices coming out currently should not be abandoning it.</p>
<p>Thick Bezel:  I cant really comment without seeing it.  You may be right, but it looks awkward.</p>
<p>Keyboard:  I think the keyboard they designed with it is best they could do with a touch screen.  I&#8217;d prefer a physical keyboard, but that would require more hardware.</p>
<p>Camera:  I agree that this device doesn&#8217;t need a camera.  The 14-year old argument however, I don&#8217;t agree with.  As the world gets smaller, offices start to spread and telecommunication becomes more standard, web cams and streaming videos are going to be a large part of corporate life.</p>
<p>Oh, and you can also use your iPhone while you poop.  The iPad doesn&#8217;t cover any of my needs, therefore I will not be purchasing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s my iTablet! by John</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/01/28/wheres-my-itablet/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=154#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>It sounds like the iPad can do what you wanted: a smaller portable device that can jot down notes, perform simple tasks such as email and surf the web, and look at documents if need be. It just doesn&#039;t have handwriting and a stylus. Those seem like two good things to me. *shrug* Also, I have to disagree, it IS a tablet, as defined by &quot;tablet PC refers to a slate shaped mobile computer device, equipped with a touchscreen or stylus to operate the computer&quot;. 

Not to white knight, Apple can throw out some duds, but I don&#039;t think the iPad is one of them.

On a related topic, it seems most of the big issues are really not that big a deal. 
As for multitasking, I have yet to see anyone come up with a compelling reason beyond &quot;I want to listen to Pandora while I ____&quot; and is a good way to murder your battery life (ask any Droid owner)
Flash is going to die (a welcome death) at the hands of HTML5, and Hulu said they plan to EVENTUALLY move away from flash for their video. 
Thick bezel? Conveniently thumb width, almost like it was by design or something.
Keyboard typing issues? Just like everyone in the world had with the iPhone for the first week they owned it.
No camera? Oh no. I will have to continue to never video chat with anyone ever. (Does anyone over 14 _really_ use video chat? Yeah, I didn&#039;t think so.)

I think this is a great starting point for the device, and it will fill a hole between laptop and iPhone well. Look how far the iPhone has come since its launch. Apple has shown that the experience on Day 1 only gets better.

On a final note, have you talked with anyone who hasn&#039;t spent the last few weeks dreaming about what wonka-esque device would be appearing today? The response has been amazingly positive. Remember, the tech community dissing this device now were the same ones who chided the iPod back in 2001, and the mini a few years after that.

Also, you can use it while you poop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the iPad can do what you wanted: a smaller portable device that can jot down notes, perform simple tasks such as email and surf the web, and look at documents if need be. It just doesn&#8217;t have handwriting and a stylus. Those seem like two good things to me. *shrug* Also, I have to disagree, it IS a tablet, as defined by &#8220;tablet PC refers to a slate shaped mobile computer device, equipped with a touchscreen or stylus to operate the computer&#8221;. </p>
<p>Not to white knight, Apple can throw out some duds, but I don&#8217;t think the iPad is one of them.</p>
<p>On a related topic, it seems most of the big issues are really not that big a deal.<br />
As for multitasking, I have yet to see anyone come up with a compelling reason beyond &#8220;I want to listen to Pandora while I ____&#8221; and is a good way to murder your battery life (ask any Droid owner)<br />
Flash is going to die (a welcome death) at the hands of HTML5, and Hulu said they plan to EVENTUALLY move away from flash for their video.<br />
Thick bezel? Conveniently thumb width, almost like it was by design or something.<br />
Keyboard typing issues? Just like everyone in the world had with the iPhone for the first week they owned it.<br />
No camera? Oh no. I will have to continue to never video chat with anyone ever. (Does anyone over 14 _really_ use video chat? Yeah, I didn&#8217;t think so.)</p>
<p>I think this is a great starting point for the device, and it will fill a hole between laptop and iPhone well. Look how far the iPhone has come since its launch. Apple has shown that the experience on Day 1 only gets better.</p>
<p>On a final note, have you talked with anyone who hasn&#8217;t spent the last few weeks dreaming about what wonka-esque device would be appearing today? The response has been amazingly positive. Remember, the tech community dissing this device now were the same ones who chided the iPod back in 2001, and the mini a few years after that.</p>
<p>Also, you can use it while you poop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on College Education: Why we Go by Matthew Doyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/01/25/college-education/comment-page-1/#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=151#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Something I’m curious to know is how do you feel about post-grad education? Specifically in relation to IT? I remember you tried to do it around the time you were graduating, but now, three years later, do you still think its worth it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;ll handle the easier question first.  Personally I would only consider going back to school if I were to focus on something vastly different than what I studied, or to sharply focus on one aspect of my current degree.  For example, I think about going to get my MBA often, because eventually I would like to be in more of a leadership role sometime in my life, and the strength of that training would assist me that that leadership role.    Or, I could go back to school in IT, or CS or whatever, and focus on a very specific specialty, and become an expert in it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Baring all this in mind, and playing devil’s advocate, what makes going to RIT that much more valuable than say DeVry?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t feel qualified to answer this question because in your post you brought up money, and I&#039;ll just say it outright:  I am one of the very, very, VERY fortunate people out there that I was helped 100% financially through my college education.  I don&#039;t know the pain of paying for a really expensive school.  However, I will give my honest opinion:  Up to present time, it&#039;sall about the name.  RIT is regarded as a fine technological school, DeVry is joked about on Family Guy (I personally won&#039;t judge what I don&#039;t know).  I think moving forward however, paying the higher price will have to net you more than a name.  For example, while it can never be guaranteed, I believe high end (and high cost) schools should have one of their core values to be &quot;Help each and every one of our students find a job after college.&quot; Also, schools need to take care of their alumni.  RIT is ranked top 20 of the best career services schools.  

Paul, thanks for a well thought out post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Something I’m curious to know is how do you feel about post-grad education? Specifically in relation to IT? I remember you tried to do it around the time you were graduating, but now, three years later, do you still think its worth it?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll handle the easier question first.  Personally I would only consider going back to school if I were to focus on something vastly different than what I studied, or to sharply focus on one aspect of my current degree.  For example, I think about going to get my MBA often, because eventually I would like to be in more of a leadership role sometime in my life, and the strength of that training would assist me that that leadership role.    Or, I could go back to school in IT, or CS or whatever, and focus on a very specific specialty, and become an expert in it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Baring all this in mind, and playing devil’s advocate, what makes going to RIT that much more valuable than say DeVry?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel qualified to answer this question because in your post you brought up money, and I&#8217;ll just say it outright:  I am one of the very, very, VERY fortunate people out there that I was helped 100% financially through my college education.  I don&#8217;t know the pain of paying for a really expensive school.  However, I will give my honest opinion:  Up to present time, it&#8217;sall about the name.  RIT is regarded as a fine technological school, DeVry is joked about on Family Guy (I personally won&#8217;t judge what I don&#8217;t know).  I think moving forward however, paying the higher price will have to net you more than a name.  For example, while it can never be guaranteed, I believe high end (and high cost) schools should have one of their core values to be &#8220;Help each and every one of our students find a job after college.&#8221; Also, schools need to take care of their alumni.  RIT is ranked top 20 of the best career services schools.  </p>
<p>Paul, thanks for a well thought out post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on College Education: Why we Go by Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2010/01/25/college-education/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=151#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>From the tone of her article, I got the impression that she isn&#039;t really hostile to the idea of going to college, just ideal of going to an expensive, higher-end private institution (which are stereotypically liberal arts based) in order to get the best possible education and be assured of landing a good job right out of college. From that view, I can see her point as the average tuition costs continue to go up thousands at a time (don&#039;t forget, RIT is a hefty 30k+ a year, nothing to sneeze at). Whatever benefit you receive from 4-5 years of college, will hinder you in the long term when you have to spend potentially decades paying back the financial costs of that benefit plus interest, unless you are fortunate enough to receive financial aid, scholarships, or other funding (and even then, it is rare that those cover the entirety of your costs). The two advantages you mention college provides: a safe environment to try new things and the chance to obtain a degree can be found at their core at a cheaper, lesser school all the same. Also, while the degree is important for getting a job later, it won&#039;t exactly get you into the cube right after you get it (not anymore at least). From my experience (in relation to IT), most employers seem to count the degree as a binary decision when evaluating you (do you have one or don&#039;t you), and after that initial check, the decision to hire you a mainly based around your job experience and your knowledge of the subject matter, the latter of which, as she points out, isn&#039;t exclusively obtainable at college anymore. Baring all this in mind, and playing devil&#039;s advocate, what makes going to RIT that much more valuable than say DeVry?

Something I&#039;m curious to know is how do you feel about post-grad education? Specifically in relation to IT? I remember you tried to do it around the time you were graduating, but now, three years later, do you still think its worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the tone of her article, I got the impression that she isn&#8217;t really hostile to the idea of going to college, just ideal of going to an expensive, higher-end private institution (which are stereotypically liberal arts based) in order to get the best possible education and be assured of landing a good job right out of college. From that view, I can see her point as the average tuition costs continue to go up thousands at a time (don&#8217;t forget, RIT is a hefty 30k+ a year, nothing to sneeze at). Whatever benefit you receive from 4-5 years of college, will hinder you in the long term when you have to spend potentially decades paying back the financial costs of that benefit plus interest, unless you are fortunate enough to receive financial aid, scholarships, or other funding (and even then, it is rare that those cover the entirety of your costs). The two advantages you mention college provides: a safe environment to try new things and the chance to obtain a degree can be found at their core at a cheaper, lesser school all the same. Also, while the degree is important for getting a job later, it won&#8217;t exactly get you into the cube right after you get it (not anymore at least). From my experience (in relation to IT), most employers seem to count the degree as a binary decision when evaluating you (do you have one or don&#8217;t you), and after that initial check, the decision to hire you a mainly based around your job experience and your knowledge of the subject matter, the latter of which, as she points out, isn&#8217;t exclusively obtainable at college anymore. Baring all this in mind, and playing devil&#8217;s advocate, what makes going to RIT that much more valuable than say DeVry?</p>
<p>Something I&#8217;m curious to know is how do you feel about post-grad education? Specifically in relation to IT? I remember you tried to do it around the time you were graduating, but now, three years later, do you still think its worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visible=&#8221;false&#8221; vs. display:none; by Madhu</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/2008/10/13/visiblefalse-vs-displaynone/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewdoyle.net/?p=6#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>This helped me a lot. Thanks for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This helped me a lot. Thanks for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

